Pardon My Paranoia

I Love My CountryOn the mental bookshelf holding my imagined-but-yet-unwritten novels is the story of a revolutionary movement in contemporary California. Hispanics, angered at their treatment and the historic theft of the state’s wealth from their Mexican homeland, embark on a campaign to take California back, using traditional terrorist tactics such as bombings to deliver their message. In response, the government declares a state of martial law, imposing severe restrictions on the movement and civil liberties of the citizens in the name of protecting them from terrorism.

The twist: the government quickly finds and eradicates the terrorist cell. But the powers-that-be realize that a citizenry under martial law is much easier to control. They decide not to let the public in on the fact that the terrorists have been eliminated, and instead occasionally stage skirmishes and explosions to make it look as if danger still lurks. It takes the efforts of one man, formerly accused of being one of the terrorists, to find proof of this dastardly turn of events.

I don’t think this is a particularly original story (and in fact, my creative writing teacher in college said that the ancient Greeks used all the good plots first). It is probably inspired by a book I read back in the days after Watergate called The Last President (not to be confused with one of the more recent Daybreak series with the same name). Therein authors Michael Kurland and S. W. Barton postulate what would have happened if the presidential administration (read: Nixon) had murdered two enterprising journalists (read: Woodward and Bernstein) before they were able to uncover anything compromising about the administration (read: Watergate). In it, just as in my story, the authorities plan further attacks on the public in order to justify the suspension of civil liberties.

Now, I am not a left-wing nut job who sees right-wing nut jobs lurking around every corner and behind every explosion. But my unpublished novelist’s mind can’t help plotting. Anyone who lived through the 20th century would do the same; it’s not as if it’s never happened before. The government has always found someone for us to fear, sometimes justifiably, sometimes not. In the 1920s and 1930s, it was the Bolsheviks. In the 1940s, it was the Japanese. In the 1950s, it was the Communists again. In the 1960s, it was the radicals. In the 1970s, it was Palestinian terrorists making political demands. Later, it became Islamic terrorists making religious statements. Roseanne Rosannadanna was right.

At the same time, American history is littered with instances of the government overstepping its bounds in the name of furthering its own goals: Watergate, Iran-Contra, and more recently, we had to invade Iraq because of those weapons of mass destruction (which turned out to be no more real than my novel). Back during the Watergate hearings, bumperstickers popped up saying I love my country but I fear my government. Back then, they were plastered on cars belonging to liberals; today I suspect Tea Party supporters might claim them too.

Add to that the unsettling feeling generated by a 2010 Washington Post report that discovered:

The top-secret world the government created in response to the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, has become so large, so unwieldy and so secretive that no one knows how much money it costs, how many people it employs, how many programs exist within it or exactly how many agencies do the same work.

Sometimes I worry that hell hath no fury like a government agency in jeopardy of losing its funding. We’ve been relatively safe over the last dozen years since 9/11, underwear bombers aside. But what happens when politicians in the throes of sequester start looking for budgets to dismantle? What’s to stop an agency or agencies chartered with stopping terrorism from staging a high-prolife, low-fatality event just to convince us of the necessity of their existence? How would we know?

All I’m saying is, if the members of the Tsarnaev family who believe the brothers were framed are right, we may have more to fear than we think we do.

Advertisements

About middleagecranky

The Middle-Age Cranky blog is written by baby boomer Howard Baldwin, who finds the world, while occasionally wondrous, increasingly aggravating.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Pardon My Paranoia

  1. Larry Marion says:

    Roseanne Rosannadanna was right–“It’s always something.”

  2. AnnR says:

    I don’t think they were framed. It’s a sad story of a brother gone off the rails who dragged the other along. But, I think we have reason to be concerned about the top-secret society that’s grown up around some legitimate security concerns. I’ve come to think that Michael Moore’s movie “Fahrenheit 9/11” was not just the work of someone with a liberal axe to grind.

  3. Markus Berg says:

    “Of course the people don’t want war. But after all, it’s the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it’s always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it’s a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger.”

    — Herman Göring at the Nuremberg trials

    Citation: http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/holoprelude/goering.html

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s