The Curse of Rigiditea

As a former Republican, I am watching the Ferris wheel of the 2012 presidential campaign with unbridled glee. Candidates rise, candidates fall, candidates rise again, in an endless circle of breezy blather.

I can’t remember a campaign when a party was less excited about its potential nominees, unless perhaps it was 1988. That was the year satirist Mark Russell quipped, “Man, if it ends being Bush vs. Dukakis, there isn’t enough caffeine in America to keep me awake.”

But the 2012 campaign is different. Like any carnival ride that involves changes in elevation, this one is keeping me awake. On the other hand, if I were still a Republican, I would be getting nauseous by now. It’s well documented that the conservative wing of the party – which apparently now is the only wing of the party – mistrusts Mitt Romney’s conservative credentials. After all, he passed a health care bill that actually has some value. But neither are they happy with anybody else.

Truly, the Republicans have no one to blame but themselves. The party has fallen prey to a bunch of zealots. It shouldn’t be called the Tea Party; it should be called the Rigiditea Party. The problem comes down to this: you can’t apply the black-and-white of religion to the gray of politics.

Religion is rife with images of purity. Priests and nuns are supposed to be celibate. Even Jesus’ mother was supposed to be a virgin. As the joke goes, they’re the Ten Commandments, not the Ten Suggestions. There is no “on the other hand” to the idea of coveting your neighbor’s wife. I get that.

But real life is chaotic. It doesn’t fall into neat little cubbyholes. Sometimes people lose their jobs and need unemployment checks. Sometimes teen-age boys get teen-age girls pregnant. Sometimes men fall in love with other men. Sometimes, in a commonwealth, we channel tax dollars to support the common wealth (which is actually the derivation of the word: people coming together for the betterment of all). And sometimes we waste that money, because we’re imperfect.

So either we’re tolerant of our collective imperfect humanity, or we’re not. You can insist that everyone in your family follows a rigid path, but you can’t make that same determination for everyone else. It doesn’t work (sometimes it doesn’t even work in your own family – hey, Sarah, how’d that abstinence thing work out for your daughter?).

The proof is in the 2012 campaign. Just as the Republicans apply their rigidity to society as a whole, they also apply that rigidity to their politicians. In the real world. politicians have to make compromises. They have to do the best they can with the resources they have. That’s why, at some time, every single one of the Republican candidates has done something that their potential supporters find abhorrent.

Unfortunately, the rigiditea doesn’t stop with holding candidates to an unrealistic yardstick. It extends to the idiocy that it is better to have an ideologically pure candidate than to compromise on someone who might actually win the election. This is nothing new. I saw this growing up in California, where since 1968, the Republicans have made an art of nominating unelectable right-wingers over viable, more-liberal choices.

The problem is that they’re now applying this same rigiditea to politicians that have already been elected. As one moderate Republican congressman lamented in the New York Times last September, “You’re either an ally or a traitor.”

None of us – politicians, Republicans, citizens – live in an angelic world free of sin. But as long as the members of the Rigiditea Party judge their candidates against a yardstick that’s never touched Planet Earth, they’re going to remain a minority party. And we’re going to be stuck with the gridlock that results. That’s not a gleeful prospect at all. It’s a curse on all of us.

Advertisements

About middleagecranky

The Middle-Age Cranky blog is written by baby boomer Howard Baldwin, who finds the world, while occasionally wondrous, increasingly aggravating.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to The Curse of Rigiditea

  1. Virginia says:

    There’s plenty of ideological purity-hounding on the left, too; observe all the folks who are shocked and dismayed at Obama buying dumplings at a restaurant that still serves shark-fin soup. But it’s true that the Republicans seem to have it down to a fine art right now.

  2. Geoffrey says:

    Great post, Howard.

    @Virginia, you have a point – those on the far, far left and those on the far, far right have a funny way of converging on a totalitarian view of the world. (Einstein was right: Space is curved.)

  3. Judit Sarossy says:

    Masterpiece! I love it. It is just so true. I would love to see that all people would register as independents. That might wake up the politicians. 🙂

  4. gingerR says:

    Amen!

    We got a call from a place that’s pushing for open primaries. I have to wonder if opening up the selection process to everybody would do any good.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s